Protecting 1000 years of village life

In 2010 Peterborough City Council released its Site Allocations Development Plan Document, which outlined how the city and its surrounding area could be developed up until 2021. The plans for Eye included plans to build 305 homes, 10 travellers’ pitches and a plot for travelling show people to be built in the village. Added to this will be the Norwood development (2,300 homes plus industry – (UE002 on consultation now SA1.5)) just outside the parish boundary but within easy walking distance of the village.

Continue reading “Protecting 1000 years of village life”

A16 Eye bypass – Dogsthorpe to Crowland opens

newroadoctober11

The last section of the new £80 million Peterborough to Spalding road opens.

After delays caused by slippage on the embankment the final part of the A16 from Dogsthorpe to Crowland has opened. You can read more on the reasons for the delay below. We’re just glad it eventually got there.

Youtube video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQg63ecj_7Q&feature=feedu

New road on track to open in October

newroadseptember11

Traffic could be reduced around Eye this October as the new £80 million Peterborough to Spalding road opens this October.

The road from Crowland to Spalding opened in August 2010 but due to ‘slippage’ on the embankment and road close the Car Dyke Bridge, the section from Crowland to Dogsthorpe remained closed while work was done to correct the damage. The bridge cost around £3 million and the repairs around £5million so its been an expensive little project.

More on the Evening Telegraph site here.

Anger as school bus is axed.

lorry

The road above is the one children will have to walk or cycle along now the transport has been cut. The council has said that improvements to the roundabout have meant it is now safe for children from Eye to walk to Deacons. The crossing is one thing but the road has a very high volume of traffic including articulated lorries and only a narrow path on Eye Road between Eye and Welland. Have these council staff who made this decision ever walked the route? This decision will put children’s lives at risk. Its dangerous enough for adults, without children having to walk along it and even worse in bad weather or on dark winter evenings.

Traditionally children from Eye went to Arthur Mellows Village College in Glinton. The background to this whole sorry saga started when catchment areas were redrawn in 2006 ahead of the Deacons Acadamy opening in 2007. It seems some parents were made to send their children to the brand new Deacons Academy but the school ended up with too many pupils wanting to go there so the catchment area was changed back to Arthur Mellows.

As one student commented on the storywe didn’t pick the school we got made to go there because the council changed the catchment area. And in return the promised us free transport until year 11. Is not, in fact, the distance it’s the fact that they broke the promise. And before anyone says shouldn’t have picked the school we didn’t, our right to pick a school got taken.”

And from a parent: “As a parent, I didn’t originally didn’t want my send my child to Deacons Academy. But at the time I was told I had no choice in the matter as Arthur Mellows had too many pupils. To be told a few years down the line that free transport is going to be removed because the council has changed its mind is a disgrace and I will be doing everything I have to get it re-instated. Maybe if the City Council had listened to parents in the first place rather than just rail-road changes through this could have been avoided. “

There was a story about it in the Evening Telegraph in 2006, click here.

On top of this, the three-mile limit is around half-way through the village so pupils that live on the opposite side of the village will still get transport while others will have to walk while the bus passes them on the main road. In fact, the stop that children catch the bus from is around 2.9 miles from Deacons.

The question is will the council be held accountable if a child is injured or worse walking or cycling to school?

More on the story on the Evening Telegraph website here.

UPDATE: The council have u-turned their decision to remove free transport. More here.

Public meeting is well attended

A well-attended meeting for such a cold winter evening. MP Stewart Jackson and City Council officers were in attendance. Although the council’s plans for 300 homes for Eye Green have been reduced the City Council still want to build 85 houses, 35 on Eye Green and 50 off Thorney Road. We wait in anticipation to see what the outcome of the meeting is.

The Evening Telegraph has reported that Eye Councillor David Sanders was “embarrassed” by the actions of his council.

Update: The Evening Telegraph has a full report on the meeting here.

Related: Marco Cereste, leader of Peterborough City Council becomes chairman of LarkPoint, Larkfleet homes are one of the companies building homes in Eye. Report from the Evening Telegraph here.

Editors comment: Although the reduction in housing is welcomed my thoughts are that 35 homes on the Eye Green site are just ridiculous. 20 executive houses on the Eye Green site plus 50 homes off Thorney Road could be accommodated, at a push, although we would need assurances that there will be no further growth on that scale.

Peterboroughs growth strategy for the next 14 years

Reported in the Evening Telegraph this week Peterborough City councils growth strategy to create 24,600 homes has been approved by the government. This includes 85 homes on top of the 190 homes already approved for Eye. Although the leader of the council Councillor Marco Cereste said he was delighted with the news, Eye and Thorney Councillor David Sanders attacked the designation of Eye as a “Key Service area”. Continue reading “Peterboroughs growth strategy for the next 14 years”

AMVC school bus

Earlier in the year, it was reported that the bus travel for Year 11 pupils to Arthur Mellows Village college would be removed to save money and pupils would have to catch the bus into Queensgate and back out to Glinton.

The story starts in 2006 and the error made in 2006 making Deacons Academy the main school for Eye. The academy was subsequently oversubscribed which has meant that a number of pupils still have to go to Arthur Mellows anyway. At the time Cllr John Bartlett, who represented Eye and Thorney on Peterborough City Council, added: “The whole thing is a nightmare and mistakes have been made.” Parents at the time were not too impressed neither, for more on that story click here.

The outcome of this is one set of buses goes to Deacons and another to Arthur Mellows when there just used to be buses to Arthur Mellows. Of course, this is costing a lot of money, the long term plan would have been to phase out the Arthur Mellows buses but as pupils are still going there this isn’t going to happen anytime soon so the council has found a way to save money by removing bus access for Year 11 pupils.

Whether this is fair or not I’ll leave you to decide, the situation is being ‘monitored’ Cllr Holditch has said.

Eye and Thorney campaigners anger over plans for consultations

CAMPAIGNERS fear objections raised against proposed new homes and travellers’ sites by hundreds of residents Eye and Thorney residents could be ignored. Their concerns were sparked when it was revealed that the Rural North Neighbourhood Council will be asked on Thursday to approve or reject proposals, including 300 new homes to be built in Eye, that are included in Peterborough City Council’s Site Allocations Document…

Read more here

Eye Housing Plans

Big turnout last night as plans for the further development of Eye were discussed. Over 275 people gathered at Eye Community Centre to find out more about Peterborough City Councils plans to build an extra 305 home and 10 travellers pitches to the east of the village. Over 500 letters of objection were handed over to the planning officers. Richard Kay, the Council’s Policy and Strategy Manager did admit that it was quite a large amount for Eye. The consultation period ends on Thursday 22nd April.